Esperanto helps the country to save more money.

The world leaders as well as the country leaders are blindfolded, perhaps.



If they introduce Esperanto in the schools, they can save tons of money. Of course, you may say, that would better for not learning another language, just teach one language. But, don't be silly enough not to know bilingual is better than monolingual.

But, if you choose to learn a language which cost more than 500 hours and consider that is effective, your sense of economy is very bad.

Esperanto needs 150 hours, maybe 200 hours to learn and command at the intermediate level. If the learners are language lovers, they can proceed to learn other languages at their own expenses.

I believe that your country has many economists to help to calculate the cost. However, most countries do not produce the economist that look at the language, Malaysia is one of the example.

Bilingual at the early age can bring in many benefits. Read here.

Besides, Esperanto has 3 folds benefits.

If you want your children to be smarter and less torment in the old age, push Esperanto to be the second language in your country,community and homes.