Should it be Esperanto or others ?

I think I am all the time in and out of this thinking quesiton. Time and again, people argue about what and why the Esperanto is to be the international auxiliary language (IAL) or should other constructed language be.

With little knowledge of other 899 constructed languages, as the web said it has 900 constrcuted languages in the world now and soon there will be another with Asian flavour out as a part of Esperanto,I am confused in actual fact why many people still battling for the constructed language to be used since UNESCO has 'recognised' Esperanto ( wondering it is recommending or recognising Esperanto).

Certainly Esperanto has come a long way and paid a high price for it with the 'crazy' country leaders who would see a language related to the 'left' or 'spy' images.

The arguments and suggestions on promoting Esperanto have been flooded everywhere online as well at the coffee table. Hope it would one day in the UN conference. As many still remain in the earlier days' idealogy, they still do not feel the time is flying and the languages are dying in the speed of seconds due to the imperialism, it may not be English but it could be any languages in a country that show power over the others.

However, it is still the reality comes to defuse fantasy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

ແອສປາໂຍນຊ່ວຍປະຢັດເງິນສໍາລັບປະເທດຂອງທ່ານ.