Don't kill the talents, please, the world leaders.

Well, this report also reflected in many countries in ASEAN, for example, Thailand, Laos, Cambodia, Indonesia, which make learning of English a compulsary task for the pupils but they, the leaders never think of how much they use the language. That goes as well to China to make passing of English a must for some universities and they are killing the talents. Hope China has realised that and introduced Esperanto as a subject.

“Too often the teaching was too uninspiring and did not bring the language to life for pupils,” they add.

One barrier is the fact that they have little opportunity to speak the language they studying.

Well, teachers all the time shoulder the blame.

Inspectors complained that “teachers’ lack of use of the target language to support their pupils’ routine use of the language as well as opportunities for them to talk spontaneously” was hampering delivery of the subject.

Esperanto is a very low cost in economy of language.

Thus, if more leaders in the world could realise that what is the cost and propaedeutic effects of language learning, certainly, Esperanto is the best choice, cxu ne ?

This is the discontinue GCSE Esperanto vocabulary list. Who is to be blamed in this case ?  Can this be revived ?

Candidates for the (now-discontinued) NEAB GCSE examination in Esperanto were expected to know the words in these lists. Basic level vocabulary is shown in boldface type.