Comment: The Evolution of Esperanto

There goes again about language evolution.

How many people still think critically and defich the so called linguists’ theory, misconception theory.

I do not want to go further to make for the case as I did say about this numerous times in this blog and other social media pages.

Why should a language evolve?

There are still tribal language using only 80 words throughout their life. Of course, they do not have the modern gadget like mobile phone, internet, car etc. If these things were in their life, 80 words will become 180 words and gradually, the vocabulary in this tribal will be evolve into thousands. Is this the evolution or the need acquisition?

Language lovers never know the plight of non language lovers. The linguists in this modern era are still harping in the old theories. Language must change and evolve into new words. Dear friends, in the Latin-based languages, your alphabets may be in 26 letters or Esperanto in 28 letters, there are still made up by these letters. Is there a new evolution?

Again, I would like to suggest to those linguists who are constantly clinking on the old theories, language must be evolved or change, to learn Chinese language. You can see the language still using the 4000 years ago vocabulary. Chinese language is not a glutinous language, where one can add a letter to make it into a new word. Chinese language evolved, changed from picture. From drawing to the strokes.

I do not know other languages which were from picture. Even Sanskrit is also sound based and can change, add or subtract to the spelling of words.

Please wake up in this internet age. If you only know a few languages, do study them carefully, best not to choose the Latin-based languages, study other languages, maybe Chinese is the best.